USA: – Israelske bosættelser er ikke i strid med folkeretten

-International lov fremtvinger ikke en bestemt løsning, israelerne og palæstinenserne må forhandle om en løsning, sagde den amerikanske udenrigsminister Mike Pompeo.

USAs udenrigsminister Mike Pompeo. (Foto: Bjarte Bjellås, MIFF)

Mandag den 18. november meddelte Trump-administrationen, at de ikke betragter israelske bosættelser som ulovlige i henhold til folkeretten.

– At vi ikke længere vil overveje israelske bosættelser, som værende i modstrid med folkeretten er baseret på unikke kendsgerninger, historie og omstændigheder i forbindelse med oprettelsen af civile bosættelser på Vestbredden. Vores beslutning i dag påvirker ikke eller slutter juridiske konklusioner om situationer i andre dele af verden, sagde udenrigsminister Mike Pompeo.

– At erklære oprettelsen af civile bosættelser i strid med folkeretten har ikke hjulpet. Det har ikke fremmet fredens sag. Den barske sandhed er, at der aldrig vil være en juridisk løsning på konflikten, og tvister om, hvad der er rigtigt og forkert i henhold til folkeretten, skaber ikke fred. Det er et komplekst politisk problem, der kun kan løses i forhandlinger mellem israelere og palæstinensere, fortsatte han. Bosættelsernes status skal også afklares under forhandlingerne.

Her er den amerikanske udenrigsminister Mike Pompeos fulde erklæring den 18. november 2019:

Turning now to Israel, the Trump administration is reversing the Obama administration’s approach towards Israeli settlements.

U.S. public statements on settlement activities in the West Bank have been inconsistent over decades. In 1978, the Carter administration categorically concluded that Israel’s establishment of civilian settlements was inconsistent with international law. However, in 1981, President Reagan disagreed with that conclusion and stated that he didn’t believe that the settlements were inherently illegal.

Denne artikel er en gave til dig fra medlemmerne i Med Israel for Fred (MIFF). Hvis du også bliver medlem, kan vi nå ud med sandheden om Israel til endnu flere. Hvis du allerede er medlem, håber vi, at du vil rekruttere en ven nu. Klik her for at gå til indmeldelsesblanket. Medlemskab er gratis året ud!

Subsequent administrations recognized that unrestrained settlement activity could be an obstacle to peace, but they wisely and prudently recognized that dwelling on legal positions didn’t advance peace. However, in December 2016, at the very end of the previous administration, Secretary Kerry changed decades of this careful, bipartisan approach by publicly reaffirming the supposed illegality of settlements.

After carefully studying all sides of the legal debate, this administration agrees with President Reagan. The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not per se inconsistent with international law.

I want to emphasize several important considerations.

First, look, we recognize that – as Israeli courts have – the legal conclusions relating to individual settlements must depend on an assessment of specific facts and circumstances on the ground. Therefore, the United States Government is expressing no view on the legal status of any individual settlement.

The Israeli legal system affords an opportunity to challenge settlement activity and assess humanitarian considerations connected to it. Israeli courts have confirmed the legality of certain settlement activities and has concluded that others cannot be legally sustained.

Second, we are not addressing or prejudging the ultimate status of the West Bank.  This is for the Israelis and the Palestinians to negotiate. International law does not compel a particular outcome, nor create any legal obstacle to a negotiated resolution.

Third, the conclusion that we will no longer recognize Israeli settlements as per se inconsistent with international law is based on the unique facts, history, and circumstances presented by the establishment of civilian settlements in the West Bank. Our decision today does not prejudice or decide legal conclusions regarding situations in any other parts of the world.

And finally – finally – calling the establishment of civilian settlements inconsistent with international law hasn’t worked. It hasn’t advanced the cause of peace.

The hard truth is there will never be a judicial resolution to the conflict, and arguments about who is right and wrong as a matter of international law will not bring peace.  This is a complex political problem that can only be solved by negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

The United States remains deeply committed to helping facilitate peace, and I will do everything I can to help this cause. The United States encourages the Israelis and the Palestinians to resolve the status of Israeli settlements in the West Bank in any final status negotiations.

And further, we encourage both sides to find a solution that promotes, protects the security and welfare of Palestinians and Israelis alike.

Tidligere artikelFire raketter fra Syrien skudt ned
Næste artikelTel Aviv starter Shabbat-bus fra på fredag
Du er velkommen til at kommentere på artiklen!

I vores kommentarfelt har Med Israel For Fred (MIFF) givet ytringsfrihed for medlemmer og modstandere siden 2001. Skriv dit indlæg med dit rigtige navn og hold dig til sagen. Chikane er uacceptabelt. Undgå alle former for spam. Brud på retningslinjerne medfører, at kommentarer bliver slettet eller at du bliver blokeret.

Avatar
Conrad Myrland (f. 1979) er daglig leder og ansvarlig redaktør i MIFF. Han utviklet nettstedet på sin fritid fra januar 2001 til juli 2007. Fra august 2007 har Myrland arbeidet fulltid for MIFF. Myrland har utdannelse i økonomi og administrasjon fra Høgskolen i Stavanger og internett-studier ved Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia. I perioden 2001-2005 var han fungerende redaktør, deskansvarlig og journalist i lokalavisen Solabladet. Myrland har vært medarbeider for MIFFs medlemsavis Midtøsten i fokus siden 1995.